Title: AIE Capstone
Course: AI Guide Academy > Section: AI in Education (AIE)

Describe your workflow for each of the activities you completed in the AI in Education module. Explain what worked well. Lastly, tell us one thing that you will take with you from this course.

-> Projects can be submitted in English or German.

 Creating learning goals
 Finding content
 Making slides
 Designing an activity
 Creating a test
 Takeaway from course

Grading form:

Feedback AIE

Clarity and Completeness

- Missing or unclear descriptions of key activities.
- Minimal details; vague descriptions.
- Activities generally described; some clarity issues.
- Most activities described with good clarity.
- All workflow activities are fully described with excellent clarity.
Relevance and Realism

- Details are not relevant or unrealistic.
- Some unrealistic or unfitting elements.
- Generally relevant, but some assumptions questionable.
- Details are mostly relevant and plausible.
- Details are highly relevant and realistic.
Evaluating and Selecting Appropriate Tools

- Minimal or no evaluation. Tool choice appears random or unsupported.
- Limited comparison or vague criteria. Selection lacks clarity or strong support.
- Compares some tools with basic criteria. Justification is present but not fully convincing.
- Evaluates several tools effectively. Selection is appropriate with a solid rationale.
- Compares multiple tools using clear, relevant criteria. Selection is well-justified and context-aware.
Designing a Didactically Solid Workshop

- Lacks key components. Goals, structure, and didactic understanding are missing or flawed.
- Partial coverage with vague goals, weak structure, or limited alignment. Some components misunderstood.
- Addresses most components adequately. Some goals or structures may lack clarity or proper alignment.
- Covers all components clearly with mostly strong alignment. Minor gaps in integration or depth.
- Fully addresses all components with deep understanding and strong alignment. Goals, methods, and assessments are well-integrated; uses ARIVA, Bloom’s, and testing criteria effectively.